Should Obama Release Birth Certificate? Or Is This Old News?

1619 Comments

test image

edith

hey betty, I seen Jesus last night, he told me to tell you that
your days are numbered. small number

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:30 PM Report 

test image

WJS

This is something that needs to be settled. Willingly or through the courts!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:07 PM Report 

test image

Jared

I find it utterly amazing that Fox News has ignored this blaringly obvious issue from the beginning. I believe they were trying to avoid a national conflict on a revolutionary scale. What they fail to realize is that the truth will come out eventually, and the longer this foreigner stays in office, the more damage he is going to do to our once free nation, the worse off we're all going to be. Kick this socialist back to Kenya.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:01 PM Report 

test image

Joe

next time I go to the DMV and they ask for my birth certificate... can I just tell them it is on the internet?
what astounds me is Gibb's smug disregard for 400,000 americans and disrespect for a member of the press with his drum role and arrogant laugh.
I guess they don't serve or answer too any of us... what reason do any of us have to believe that any of them will keep the second part of their oath to protect the people.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:14 PM Report 

test image

True American

Well, it just goes to show you how much he is really hiding and what he most likely has up his sleeve for all of America - scariest time of my entire life.....

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:59 PM Report 

test image

joea

Release the long form birth certificate (not the COLB), college transcripts, and selective service registration records, and medical records.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:55 PM Report 

test image

Mr Tin Foil

I am all for transparency - starting with BO's vault copy B.C. NOT something called a "Certificate of Live Birth" posted on the internet of dubious origins!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:53 PM Report 

test image

heydeb

Yes it is important !!! Do it NOW!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:52 PM Report 

test image

Constitution Rocks

Talk about arrogance......BO is so arrogant that he believes he can continue his charade as POTUS without proving his legality. He definitely has something to hide, otherwise he wouldn't resist providing the authentic certificate and not a copy of live birth which isn't acceptable for a drivers license!! If you look up "arrogant" in the dictionary you will see BO"S press secretary face when asked about BO's birth certificate! The H. of Rep is working on legislation right now that will assist BO in hiding his proof of citizenship. ALL AMERICANS DESERVE TO SEE PROOF.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:51 PM Report 

test image

Mabel

He is NOT ABOVE THE LAW as he so frequently says about everybody else. He is required by the U.S.Constitution to be a citizen of the U. S. Even if it is a technicality he may not be, and needs to stop paying thousands to lawyers to keep it under lock and key. He is supposed to be open????? Show your college admission papers, your passport, financial aid papers, and any publications you made while in college, BO, and prove who you really are (Barry Soetoro). YOU ARE NOT ABOVE THE LAW AND YOU ARE ACCOUNTABLE TO THE PEOPLE OF THE U.S. AND THE U.S.CONSTITUTION, WHICH YOU SWORE TO UPHOLD. If he is not a citizen then every executive order and action he promises on behalf of the U.S. is fraudulent and null and void. Every order he makes to our armed forces is likely to be disobeyed. They are sworn to protect the CONSTITUTION. BO wants to change that and make the swear to uphold the POTUS . Perhaps that's why he wants an empathetic justice on the SCOTUS. He needs support when it comes to not following the LAW OF THE LAND. This is not about race either as I have heard some say. "Judge a man by the content of his character and not by the color of his skin"
(MLK ) BO is a very deceptive man who is obviously hiding the very papers that could put an end to all of this discussion. I don't think he has a decent character.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:42 PM Report 

test image

harpotoo

A COLB (at that time could be issued to anyone foreigners included) is sure as hell not a BC!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:39 PM Report 

test image

sadtimes

My eyes have been opened by this issue. The fact that the media has refused to cover this issue is astounding. The fact that the judges all over our country are complicit in this lie is amazing. The fact that the "president" is willing to lie to our faces about this while professing "openess and change" is unbelievable. If someone is willing to lie about the seemingly small things then he will definitely have no trouble doing it when it comes to the bigger issues. This is scary and this guy needs to come clean or forced to come out into the open. I am happy to see FOX finally at least ask a question about this but honestly you guys have dropped the ball big time in an attempt to avoid politically correct backlash. Shameful.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:37 PM Report 

test image

Jude

He doesn't even have to produce the certificate to shut me up. I want him to answer publicly exactly where he was born, what passport he used to travel to Pakistan and Indonesia in 1981, and did he receive funds as a foreign student to pay for college? Then, he should allow the agencies with this information to confirm or deny what he says. They would not have to release anything. This issue is the straw that broke the camel's back for me. I don't buy or read newspapers or magazines anymore. I no longer watch news or commentary programs on tv. This used to be a big part of my life; now, I get my information from Drudge and other sources which I deem reliable. Also, it doesn't take a genius to figure out the difference between citizen and "natural born" citizen. There is a good reason why the visionary founders of our country placed this restriction in our constitution. The news media of today is complicit in the trashing of the very foundation of our land. God will protect those of us who show respect for the law of our land but woe to those who don't.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:16 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

Jude,
You probably know that Soetoro has never made a public statement on why he considers himself a "NATURAL BORN" citizen. The only comment I remember hearing was from his campaign staff. They said it was "garbage"
That's the statement from our leader of the free world.
Why can't he have a fireside chat and tell the American people that he considers himself a "NATURAL BORN" citizen because.........and complete the story.
He won't and can't because he can never be a "NATURAL BORN' citizen unless he goes back thru a time machine and his mother has sex with an American man and a U.S. citizen.
However, I would love to hear his explanation. Something, like the dog ate my homework

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:41 PM Report 

test image

silasmarner

This is very scary, indeed. How can there be a more important issue facing our country than the constitutional eligibility of our President? By refusing to release his birth certificate, as well as his other records, it sure appears he has something to hide. The questions are not going away.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:03 PM Report 

test image

The Remnant

Fox is the only one covering this...the powers that be at FNC should release the dogs of war on this subject and not take no for an answer...its one thing for a World Net Daily reporter to get laughed at by Press Secretary Gibbs but another thing for them to laugh at Fox News asking the same question...have FOX NEWS REALLY DIG INTO THIS...give it some credence...

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:50 PM Report 

test image

Brett

WHY has Fox news never reported on this story? You cowards! This story has only been around for over a tear.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:48 PM Report 

test image

13Sisters76

For crying out loud- why doesn't BO just tell the state of Hawaii to de-classify his stupid doc? This is ridiculous- doesn't BO know that he can put an end to all the speculation if he just shows it?
IF he is not a natural born citizen, yes, there will be a a Constitutional crisis and Yes, he will be removed from office. He looks as if he has something to hide.
But before the Birthers get all excited, I would like to remind them: be careful what you wish for. Do you REALLLY want BO out? Do you REALLLY want Joe BIDEN to be president? Get a grip folks.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:36 PM Report 

test image

desade

I'll take Biden any day over a fraud, if that's what the facts prove. Yes Biden has issues, but at least he is a natural born citizen. Let's just hope if it DID happen, he doesn't ask pelosi to be the new VP. LOL

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:08 PM Report 

test image

rusty

sorry my first visit to site and for no reason ,but curiosity, i hit the report button on miss mary's comment. i fully agree with her statement and would like to apologize for hitting the button.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:27 PM Report 

test image

Rusty in tampa

Please help us Fox News! Lets get to the bottom of this once and for all.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:27 PM Report 

test image

MOM

Good discussion, but I'm tired of looking at Gibb's goofy grin.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:24 PM Report 

test image

Rick in CA

Me too. Somebody tell Mike Tyson that Gibbs was in his house with his daughter when she died. Get that on video.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:22 PM Report 

test image

PleaseConsiderThis

http://www.worldnetdaily.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=98546
It is difficult to understand that if you have nothing to conceal, why spend so much money and energy to keeping records concealed...long form of a birth certificate and school records. It seems that this cloud of doubt could be dispelled so easily if the records are revealed.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:23 PM Report 

test image

John C.

"It is difficult to understand that if you have nothing to conceal, why spend so much money and energy to keeping records concealed...long form of a birth certificate and school records. It seems that this cloud of doubt could be dispelled so easily if the records are revealed."
Remember your dealing with liars,cheats thieves and cons in DC

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 06:50 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

to All:
Chuck Darwin will try to make the case that a "natural born" citizen can be anyone born on U.S. soil.
Think about this for a moment.
After fighting the Revolutionary War with Great Britain, the framers of the Constitution would insert two distinct words of "natural born" citizens as a requirement to be president.
These men wrote with great precision in writing the Constitution and the two words "natural born" had a solid definition at the time.
What you will have to believe is the framers would find no fault with the Son of a British citizen from Kenya being the Commander and Chief of the American
armies. They purposely would allow just anyone born in the U.S. to be president. If so, why use the words "natural born" to define the level of citizenship??
I'll make it easy on you. They did NOT want the Son of a British citizen from Kenya to command the armies defending America.
Natural Born is 100% American, two American parents and birth on U.S. soil.
It's our highest level of citizenship required to be president or vice-president.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:21 PM Report 

test image

Bob from Wisconsin

You got it all right man. The rules that were used at that time were "the laws of nations".
Both parents and the soil thingy.
Carry on,
Semper Fi

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:38 PM Report 

test image

Woody Woodchuck

Well, considering the fact that the founders were born British subjects, you kind of have a bad argument.
Furthermore, a natural born citizen is someone born on U.S. soil, according to law, despite whatever you think.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:32 PM Report 

test image

Nick

FALSE. Read the Constitution, Woody Woodchuck. The natural born citizen clause has a grandfather provision in it.
"No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. "
Quoted from http://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution/constitution.articleii.html
Natural born only applies to people born after the adoption of the Constitution. Those who were citizens of the United States BEFORE the Constitution was adopted were exempt.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:49 PM Report 

test image

Bob from Wisconsin

You could read the "law of nations and then read the the applicible article in our constitution, and you will see the light!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 04:44 PM Report 

test image

RSandman

NO, ignoramus, it is precisely because of their British birth and considerations for future U.S. citizens that this is not only a good argument, but a valid one with direct consequences for our security and eliminating conflict of interest and loyalty. Furthermore, U.S. citizens stationed on U.S. sovereign property, no matter the location (US embassy, US military base, US territory, etc.) IS considered "natural born" according to law and defended by judicial precedent, despite whatever you think.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:46 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

Woody,
You're full of it.
According to what law?
The founders also made an exception just for themselves in Article II as they were born under British citizenship.
When they died the Article II exception died with them.
Like I said, you're full of it.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:42 PM Report 

test image

George In Texas

The Founding Fathers may have been Brittish citizens but they were born in America....please read the definition of a natural born citizen- BOTH Parents have to be citizens AND the child has to be born on American soil to be a natural born citizen.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:40 PM Report 

test image

Springfield Reformer

Note to guy4013, there is case law to suggest that citizenship of the child does indeed rely to some extent on the jurisdictional allegiances of both the child and the parents. Simple geography is not enough. See especially Elk v. Wilkins, 83 U.S. 36 (1872) (Indian child born on US soil not a citizen because birth in reservation voided jurisdiction requirement), and the Slaughterhouse Cases, 83 U.S. 36 (1872) (finding that the phrase 'subject to the jurisdiction thereof' was intended to exclude from its operation children of ... citizens or subjects of foreign states, born within the United States).

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:20 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

Springfield,
Again, I believe the case revolved around just U.S. "citizenship", not "NATURAL BORN" citizens.
I don't believe there has been a case at SCOTUS on point to just "NATURAL BORN" citizens because our history always had honorable men with known histories and birth records as candidates for president.
Excluding, Chester Arthur, our first illegal president (1881-1885)

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:48 PM Report 

test image

Legal Expert

You're hanging onto a thread if you are going back 150 years to find some "kinda like" cases.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:43 PM Report 

test image

JT in SC

YES, show it for once and for all.... IF there is nothing to hide why spend a ton of money on hiring lawyers to keep the Long Form Cert, College Records, etc secret? There are so many things about this guy....who came out of nowhere and is now running our country into the ground, bowing to Arab kings, being a general embarassment... The least they can do is END this by showing it!!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:19 PM Report 

test image

Free Bird

Barack needs to release all his records, birth, school, and passport. Transparency and abiding by the Constitution need to be followed by all American citizens, including the President. Why the secrecy? Why isn' t FOX on this story?

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:10 PM Report 

test image

Catherine

Heck YES, Fox, we want to see the birth certificate! And we sure wish YOU would beat this drum until it happens!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:09 PM Report 

test image

Chuck Darwin

In the 1898 decision, in the case of: The United States V. Wong Kim Ark, SCTOUS determined that if you were born in this country, then you are a natural born citizen of this country, even if your parents were not citizens or even if you were born the subject of the Chinese Emperor. If you were born here, then you are a natural born citizen. End of the argument.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:08 PM Report 

test image

Dark Knight

Right my friend, but at the time of his birth his mother was too young to transfer citizenship. Remember we are talking August 4, 1961. I know my BD is August 5, 1961.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 05:24 PM Report 

test image

Larry Alford

Chuck,
That may be true, but He is spending alot of time/money to
hide something...So the question still remains, was he born
in Hawaii, or Kenya, and did he become a citizen of another
country before becoming a U.S. Citizen? I had to show more
info on myself to go to work for a Corportation, with My own
equipment, so He can fess up with the information that is
demanded by the American People.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:38 PM Report 

test image

elephant in the room

who says a jugement cant be wrong? but if it is the case that his birth record shows he is a natural born citizen, but he has been nationalized by a different country shouldnt that remove the previous tag. those are my thoughts. i hope that all is well and legal in this news. i pray for this man everyday. i pray for all politicians. i await the day that "mr smith goes back to washington!" my father's thoughts were always anyone who wanted to be in politics never had any business being in politics. sometimes i agree.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:36 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

elephant in the room,
Birth records do not show you to be a "NATURAL BORN" citizen.
The accurate and historical definition is your birth is from TWO American parents and birth on U.S. soil.
You can not have someone in command of our armies who is tainted by dual citizenship or loyalties. Can he bomb Kenya or not and so on.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:56 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

elephant in the room,
Birth records do not show you to be a "NATURAL BORN" citizen.
The accurate and historical definition is your birth is from TWO American parents and birth on U.S. soil.
You can not have someone in command of our armies who is tainted by dual citizenship or loyalties. Can he bomb Kenya or not and so on.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:56 PM Report 

test image

Len

See what you did, using actual fact on this site....what WERE you thinking? You have to know by now that when you put real facts out there, these guys just can't handle it. It is like it makes their heads explode or something. As long as you say things that have only the smallest amount of truth in them, or better yet, no truth what-so-ever, then they can handle it. But throw genuine facts out there and oh boy. I just hope this site doesn't implode or something....facts...geez, man....

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:31 PM Report 

test image

guy4013

Nope! Nice try.
Wong Kim was about citizenship not "NATURAL BORN" citizens.
There has never been a case on point to "NATURAL BORN" citizens and there should not have to be some great legal case to define a phrase that has many historical definitions, most easily understood by ordinary Americans without a lawyer present.
As mentioned above, you want us to believe the framers would allow the Son of a British citizen from Kenya to be considered "NATURAL BORN" and to command the American armies, after just fighting the American Revolution.
You're insane if you believe that.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:30 PM Report 

test image

SickOfIt

Why are my comments not posting? Chuck Darwin - you need to visit Leo D'Onofrio's site before you start throwing around the US v Wong Kim Ark.

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:23 PM Report 

test image

Ange V.

Then BO should have no problem coming up with a real birth certificate!

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:21 PM Report 

test image

MOM

He's President. But it sure would be interesting to read his law journal work; see whether he considered himself a foreign student at Occidental, Columbia, and Harvard; considered himself Indonesian to travel to Pakistan in 1981

Friday, May 29, 2009 at 03:21 PM Report 

On FOX News Channel

Follow Fox Nation

Real American Stories

FOX Fan

 
News Tip
Down